The Millennium
- 3 possible interpretations:
- Premillenialism: between Christ’s coming and the judgment, we have another thousand years.
- Disadvantages:
- throws a monkey wrench into the timing—it doesn’t fit with the rest of the scheme. In the rest of Revelation, Jesus comes and then immediately there is judgment
- according to the theory Jesus is reigning on earth for a thousand years, but at the end of this time everyone is against him. Not what we would expect!
- we’ve already had the saints reigning—they’ve already been resurrected. it doesn’t make sense if they get raised again here.
- a lot of coming and going from the abyss—Satan falls and rises twice in this scheme
- Advantages
- most straightforward reading of the text
- seems to fit better with end-time promises in OT books—the lion lying with the lamb, etc.
- Amillennialism—the events of the thousand years are another statement of history from Christ’s coming to the end. Satan cast down is the same as chapter 12, when Jesus came. Satan loosed is the Great Tribulation, whereas he was bound before. A period of protection, then great persecution.
- Advantages
- makes all the timing simpler and cleaner—several things only happen once instead of twice, which seems to make more sense and fit in better
- Disadvantages
- needs a major section break at the start of chapter 20 so that we can return to the beginning of the era
- Postmillenialism (a variation of the timing of Amillenialism—the world gets better and better and more Christian until Jesus comes and practically everyone is saved. (e.g. Reconstructionism)]
- Bottom line:
- don’t get caught up in this argument—it makes very little practical difference. The sequence of events throughout the whole books is almost exactly the same whichever position you take. Christians have got caught up arguing and fighting and dividing over this issue which is such a minor one that it is pathetic and terrible to make it a big deal.
- see chart of sequence of events
|